LLLI Center for Breastfeeding Information
Journal Abstract of the Month for February 2007
“Why We Develop Food Allergies”
Author: Per Brandtzaeg
American Scientist 2007 Jan/Feb 95: 28-35
This month’s journal article is a bit of a departure from most
other JAOMs in that it comes not
from a medical journal, but instead from American Scientist, the
official magazine of science and
technology published by Sigma Xi, the Scientific Research Society. It
is a review article rather
than a research article. It was selected because not only does it
provide excellent information on
breastfeeding’s role in the development of a baby’s immune system, but
also because it is a
pleasant surprise to find such a topic for an article intended for a
more general population than
the medical journals.
Highlights
- The human immune system and the gut mature together.
- Challenges to the immune system (such as various microbes) appear
to help in the maturation process.
- Maternal antibodies, especially Secretory Immunoglobin A (SIgA),
help protect the infant until his system matures.
- Human milk is the only significant source of SIgA for the first
weeks and months of a newborn’s life.
- Allergies are the result of a number of factors including
genetics,
the barrier function of the gut lining, and the timing and dose
of challenges to the system.
Abstract:
In this article, Per Brandtzaeg states, “A human being is born with
an immature immune system
and an immature gut, and they grow up together.” He describes the
mechanisms involved in this
maturation and discusses how this process may go awry in the
development of food allergies. He
reviews the evidence suggesting that human milk is important for the
normal development of the
immature gut, and in the prevention of food allergies.
The human immune response is essentially a cellular sentry of
sorts, with two critical
determinations to be made any time the body comes in contact with a
foreign substance. The first
determination is “me” vs “not me.” The “not me” substances are then
subjected to another critical
determination: “safe” vs “not safe.” Generally, the body recognizes
itself as “safe,” and it must
learn what constitutes “not safe.” This requires establishing
equilibrium between tolerating what is
safe and aggressively attacking the rest. An allergic response happens
when the immune system
is intolerant, and fails to suppress that aggression.
The fetal environment is safe, warm, free from germs, and has little
need for its own immune system.
He is protected by his mother’s immune system. Until, that is, the
newborn finds itself on the outside
of the womb and thus surrounded by all manner of microorganisms and
other foreign substances called antigens.
The presence of these antigens helps stimulate the newborn’s immune
system, primarily through mucosal
surfaces such as the gut and respiratory structures.
The first line of defense in a newborn’s gut is the system
of immune exclusion, which uses
exported antibodies to bind germs and potentially harmful compounds on
the mucosal surface. Antibodies
coat the pathogens to prevent them from invading the gut
wall.
This immune exclusion is largely handled by a class of antibodies
called secretory immunoglobin A (SIgA).
Newborns produce little or no SIgA of their own. Guess what is the only
significant source of SIgA during
the first weeks and months of a child’s life? Human milk. The simple
act of breastfeeding helps the infant
protect himself until his immune system is mature enough to do this on
its own.
SIgA antibodies also help the infant’s gut to develop by
strengthening the gut lining to act as a barrier.
In some children, this barrier is inadequate for longer than for
others, and a lack of SIgA seems to make
the difference. At this level, the role of breastfeeding again seems
relevant. Babies who are not
getting their mothers’ milk—and therefore her stores of SIgA—may see a
delay in the maturation of this barrier function.
Brandtzaeg states that “. . . babies who breastfeed exclusively for at
least the first four
months appear to have fewer allergies.”
A baby’s chances of having allergic reactions to food appear to be
affected by both genetics and
circumstance. Indeed, the microbes that an infant encounters during a
vaginal delivery may be
important for initiating the proper development of the immune systems.
Citing a 2003 study by
Eggesbo et al, Brandtzaeg suggests that children whose mothers suffer
from various allergic
reactions are “at least eight times as likely to develop food allergy
when delivered by caesarean
section,” although caesarean delivery of maternal allergy alone do not
significantly increase risk.
Human milk also appears to help the infant’s gut to tolerate food
antigens as he begins to consume
other-than-human milk. To the immature immune system, food particles
are just as foreign
as are bacteria and other microbes. Importantly, human milk contains
antibodies to food antigens
which may help with gut tolerance. Brandtzaeg suggests that a gradual,
rather than sudden,
weaning “may promote greater tolerance to food proteins in
general.”
Interestingly enough, where a child lives can help determine how
quickly the maturation happens.
In developed countries, it may take one to ten years. In developing
countries where morbidity and
mortality rates are typically much higher, this maturation often
happens much earlier. The difference?
Quite possibly a greater exposure to germs that help stimulate the
system. Obviously, there must
be a balance between good hygiene and the need for immune system
maturation.
Brandtzaeg also discusses whether the use of probiotic preparations,
“which deliver to the gut new
colonists—either commensal bacteria or intestinal parasites from other
species,” might be useful in
counteracting the “too-hygienic lifestyle in industrialized countries”
that may be slowing the maturation
rates of the mucosal immune system:
In a double-blind study of infants with a family history of
atopy,
babies who received a daily dose of a probiotic (Lactobacillus GG
strain) for the first
six months of life had 50 percent less atopic dermatitis at age two
than did babies
who received a placebo. Allergy prevalence still differed between
study
groups four years later.
He encourages further research in this area.
Much of the article details the very specific responses to foreign
antigens by the immune system.
Brandtzaeg ends the article by pointing out that:
. . . the current epidemic of allergy in industrialized
countries is a small
price to pay for the remarkable reduction of infant mortality provided
by the
elimination of pathogens through improved hygiene. Having too few
microbes
in our immediate environment seems to be problematic, but having many
pathogens is far, far worse. Nevertheless, the pace of research raises
hope
that future therapies will compensate for the missing good microbes
needed
to develop homeostasis of mucosal immunity.
Reference:
Eggesbo, M., G. Botten, H. Stigum, P. Nafstad and P. Magnus. 2003. Is
delivery by cesarean
section a risk factor for food allergy? Journal of Allergy and
Clinical Immunobiology 112:420-426.
Keywords:
Allergy
Immune System
Breastfeeding
The full text of this article is available for free at:
http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/a
ssetid/54436
For more information on allergies, see the collection of FAQs,
New Beginnings, and Leaven articles at
http://www.llli.org/NB/NBallergies.html
abstract by Melissa Clark Vickers, Huntingdon, TN USA
Past Journal Abstracts of the
Month
Page last edited Mon Mar 03 05:37:19 UTC 2008.
